Outline and evaluate the ethical issues disclosed by the trolley problem and illustrate your answers with relevant examples drawn from English law. Thomson states that in the first case, no worker has more of a right than the other not to be killed, but in the second case, the large man does have a right …
The Trolley Problem is a scenario possessing two similar versions that begs the question of whether or not it is ethical to kill a person in order to save five. Though alike and often confused, there are distinctions between ethics and morals.
The Trolley Problem dives right into this core issue by describing a decision making scenario. Utilitarianism is damaged as an ethical theory because it oversimplifies this decision, and other decisions like it, strictly on outcome.
In the case of the trolley problem, the decision to be made will result in death.Either five individuals will die, or only one will have to lose his life. The Trolley Problem Essay. Preliminary Questions. In applying utilitarian ethics to the two trolley problems, the fundamental subject to analyze is whether the decision would cause more happiness to most people. In both versions of this problem, there is a trolley approaching a track with people tied down. This activity is a treatment of some of the issues thrown up by a thought experiment called 'The Trolley Problem', which was first outlined by the philosopher Philippa Foot, and then developed by Judith Jarvis Thomson and others. The Trolley Problems The Trolley Problems Many times in an individual’s life they are faced with difficult decisions. Problems analogous to the trolley problem arise in the design of software to control autonomous cars.
The first part of this problem puts the reader in a passive position to choose between shoving a large person onto the track causing one person to die to save the five other people and refraining and doing nothing would allow the five to die and the one person to live. These decisions create domino effect and no one decision is isolated to only the current situation. in contrast, Thomson argues that a key distinction between the first trolley problem and the second case is that in the first case, you simply redirect the harm, but in the second case, you actually have to do something to the large man to save the five workers. The greatest happiness for the most is based on measure.
The Trolley Problem says that there is a runaway train hurtling towards five workers on a railroad track. Using a thought experiment (The Trolley Problem) I will analyse highly debated issues and examine the moral, ethical and legal implications of each.
The Trolley Problem is set up in two parts. Should You Kill the Fat Man?
The Trolley Problem Essay May 2010 - First Year - Introduction to Ethics In emergency rescue cases, like Trolley, it seems to many people that it is permissible to kill an innocent person. Situations could occur in which a potentially fatal collision appears to be unavoidable, but in which choices made by the car's software , such as who or what … Obviously, pulling the switch and pushing the stranger to the train pathway would save the lives of five persons.