To conclude, in my opinion, not many scientific researches are a waste of time and money, and these would prove more effective when the research topics are selected carefully and carried out in a professional manner. There is a widely held belief that it is futile for scientists to carry out research and analysis that are time-consuming and require a huge investment of money. I faced the ielts speaking exam today(1/2/2020)part 1 was okay.but in the second part we discussed about sport.i dint hear a one quection correctly.so i said a opposite idea about the quection 2times.and the third time when examiner asked the same quection i answered correctly.i am still in the exam centre waiting to do ielts speaking.is this cause to reduce my marks alot.i am frustrated about it But research has shown that as much as 85 percent of biomedical research is a waste of time. In the last 50 years, the majority of people claim that investing money for protecting history or everything which is related to ancient events is useless because there are many crucial crises in the society and that should be solved instead. The role of basic research in chemistry and neuroscience Anthony Travis, managing director of the Sidney M. Edelstein Center for the History and Philosophy of Science, Technology and Medicine in Jerusalem, showed the important role that basic research in chemistry played in the development of synthetic fertiliser and synthetic textile colours. But putting your actual money into a company that just pokes around for things hoping to find something that would allow development of a useful invention of some kind would be very high risk. For instance, government will release a particular drug only after testing it well, this often takes more time than necessary. However, I firmly disagree there are two reasons as follows | Band: 6 It is taken from www.ieltsielts.com Lavish wedding parties are the norm in many parts of the world. This question was asked on an IELTS writing test held in Dubai on March 2012. It is always a good idea to do scientific research, as we are better off with new medicines, technologies, and so on, developed from knowledge gained. The companies have large amounts of money invested in such research and the need for positive results is paramount.
• Research is not a waste of time, but a scientific investment.

It is difficult for a scientist to remain impartial in these circumstances. (Props to the author for getting the important qualifier “biomedical” in there, by the way…) That’s a pretty bold claim, and I immediately wondered where in the world it came from. Research sessions could be implemented in the job plans of doctors.
From my point of view, to some extent, I disagree with this opinion | Band: 5