Introduction (Why) is a platform for academics to share research papers. Scholarly Journals contain articles describing high quality research that has been reviewed by experts in the field prior to publication. Unfortunately, the use of quantitative methods in research do not guarantee objectivity. Whatever you choose to write about, you will need to provide a critical judgement based on a series of criteria so it is necessary to either choose a topic that you know well or the one that you will be able to research. Abstract (Summary) The abstract, generally written by the author(s) of the article, provides a concise summary of the whole article. Undertaking a critique of a research article may seem challenging at first, but will help you to evaluate whether the article has relevance to your own practice and workplace. If an article has been published in a scholarly journal, presumably, the editors believed that it contained information significant to the discipline(s) covered by the journal. The purpose of the quantitative and qualitative research assessment tools is to provide users with a quick and simple means to evaluate the quality of research studies. Secondary Research Article. Research papers generally follow a specific format.
How to critically evaluate the quality of a research article? Look at the publisher information. Literature reviews are very informative and may cite primary articles, but they are secondary. Step 2. Research the author or authors.

Work done in the field constructs the foundation for our research and determines its course and value. Reviews, summarizes, and discusses topics of interest.

Currency: Is this a recent article?Many articles shared on social media are older articles that may relate to current events. Just because someone has a Ph.D. after his name doesn't make him an authority. Accuracy/documentation Does the article provide a detailed list of references?Scholarly and peer-reviewed research articles always include a bibliography or reference list of works consulted by the author and have clear in-text citations or footnotes about the sources used in the article. Library Research Methods: How to Evaluate an Article. If the article is not recent, the claims may no longer be relevant or have been proven wrong. Usually it highlights the focus, study results and conclusion(s) of the article. Evaluating quantitative research. Here are the different parts of the scholarly article. On a side note, it is a common myth that all of the pro-vaccine studies are funded by pharmaceutical companies. Secondary articles evaluate, critique, report on, or summarize other researchers' research.
Perhaps you are writing an evaluation essay on a movie, or you are evaluating the service provided at a local restaurant. Reading a scholarly journal article is not easy. ... it simply gives you a good reason to be extra critical and be very careful when evaluating the research. Evaluating News Sources . How to Evaluate Research Articles Step 1. The research is not original; rather, the authors look at other existing research articles on the topic. The research assessment tools describe the information that should be available in study reports and the key features of a … Quite apart from the risk of experimental error, the overuse and misuse of statistics in articles published in scholarly journals has long been a subject of controversy. A literature review is a secondary article. Trade magazines are important for professionals and students preparing to enter an industry. Currency.Relevance.Authority.Accuracy.Purpose. 10 steps for evaluating scientific papers. Posted on August 3, 2015 by Fallacy Man.

Here are a few tips that should assist you in critically evaluating the research articles … When considering a research idea, we are bound to rely on previous findings on the topic.